| Subject: | [OM] Re: Reasons *not* to drop your Oly | 
|---|---|
| From: | Clyde Soles <csoles@xxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 1999 16:50:41 -0600 | 
| >Any ideas as to what the teminal velocity might have been of the camera? Since I have to work with falling things all the time for my job and am mathmatically challenged, I sort of commissioned this useful web site to figure such things: http://www.angio.net/personal/climb/speed Note air resistance is not accounted for. Clydeorama Photo Gallery http://home.rmi.net/~csoles/index.htm < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Has anyone tried tele extenders for IS series?, Per Nordenberg | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-1 meter calibration---how easy, how to do?, *- DORIS FANG -* | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reasons *not* to drop your Oly; was: most durable camera discussion,..., Acer Victoria | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Reasons *not* to drop your Oly; was: most durable camera discussion,..., Gary Edwards | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |