| Subject: | Re: [OM] 80mm f/4 vs. 90mm f/2 macro lenses - what goes into the |
|---|---|
| From: | "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jul 1999 00:13:01 +0000 |
These prices are prior to the recent rise. 80/4.0....................$539.60 90/2.0....................$779.00 Add to that the almost obligatory - Telescopic Auto Tube.....$258.70 and you could argue the 80mm is more expensive, though only just. Giles Chip Stratton wrote: > short telephoto, and renowned for it's sharpness. Yet I understand the 80mm > to be a costly lens - more so than the 90mm? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] e-SIF completed !!!, Jerry Stackhouse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OM-2 Slow Exposures, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] 80mm f/4 vs. 90mm f/2 macro lenses - what goes into the decision?, Chip Stratton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/4, Steven_Read |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |