ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 2 or 4?

Subject:	Re: [OM] 2 or 4?
From:	Acer Victoria <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 19 Jul 1999 08:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks; the OM4 goes to 1/2000 vs. and 1/1000 on the 2S? No problem there.
Can you explain the vertical/horizontal finder?

/Acer Victoria, running low on EPM....
--
dum spiro, spero
http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01/               <--don't visit just yet!


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] 2 or 4?, Acer Victoria Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Thomas Haegin Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Thomas Heide Clausen Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Acer Victoria <= Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Thomas Heide Clausen [OM] for all you pixel lovers, Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Tom Trottier Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Pauls0627 Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Acer Victoria Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Giles Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Richard Schaetzl Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Giles Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, John Hermanson

Previous by Date:	[OM] Updates to my OM Lens Ebay History Page, Skip Williams
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Acer Victoria
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Thomas Heide Clausen
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 2 or 4?, Thomas Heide Clausen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]