| Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus 16f3.5 and 18f3.5 |
|---|---|
| From: | PCACala@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 21 May 1999 21:48:22 EDT |
Jan writes: > In particular, the 16mm fisheye is generally cheaper than the 18mm Hum? I'd say quite to the contrary. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Mercury Battery Options, Acer Victoria |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 35-70/4 or 35-70/3.6, PCACala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus 16f3.5 and 18f3.5, Denton Taylor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus 16f3.5 and 18f3.5, Frank van Lindert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |