In <19990510031638Z324678-15568+39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 05/09/99
at 11:16 PM,
"Tom Trottier" <infoanim@xxxxxx> said:
>1. Have the lens contributor pay something for the testing since he
>gets an accurate reading on his/her own lenses. I guess they do pay the
> postage 1 or 2 ways?
> 2. Publish the testing procedure & have each person replicate the
>tests.
> 2a - Each person checks & rates slides.
> 2b - Gary checks & rates slides.
>As a control, a test could be made of a known lens by the new tester.
As a scientist, I can appreciate the desire for replication and
standard-
ization; but I would *hate* to be the administrator of this proposed
scheme on a volunteer basis. It would consume great gobs of time; god
knows it takes Gary enough time to do what he has done.
les clark
-----------------------------------------------------------
lclark@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|