| Subject: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was"200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4) |
|---|---|
| From: | "Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 May 1999 11:51:24 -0400 |
>I've always figured shu-shu would be insignificant. Certainly this is true with 4300 grams worth of lens, as in this case! :>) George, The only thing I will add is, thanks for the new word. Shu-Shu. :-) Charlie L. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [way OT] quantum physics (was: Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4)), Jan Steinman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Adapters, Glen Lowry |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was"200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Tim Breen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was"200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), George M. Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |