Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-4 or 4t

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 or 4t
From: "Per Nordenberg" <per.nordenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 17:42:47 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: <Bill_J._Rice_at_RLT012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: den 5 april 1999 18:08
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 or 4t


> The OM-2S is not as well sealed from the elements as the OM-4 so it
probably
> doesn't take the humidity too well.  My trips to Florida, Hawaii, &
Singapore
> probably did it in.  The OM-4 (T, Ti) have been praised for their
o-rings
> and gaskets to keep moisture out.  I hear the reason the OM-4 (T,
Ti) is
> 1mm taller than the OM-1,2 was to make room for the gaskets.  The
OM-2S is
> also 1mm higher but alas, no gaskets.  Since my OM-2S was repaired,
it's
> once again become my camera of choice but I hesitate to take it
where the
> humidity is high.  YMMV.
>
> Bill Rice


Is this correct? If so couldn't gaskets for OM-4/T/Ti be installed in
an OM-2S body to make it weatherproof? I always thought also that it
was only the latest OM-4T/Ti that was weatherproof, not the older
OM-4.

Per Nordenberg
Kolmården, Sweden



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz