ML Archiv: RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!

Subject:	RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!
From:	George Sears <gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:31:12 -0500

>
>So what's the deal.  Is the body going back to Jan or Brian  or what.?
>
>John
>



At 05:06 PM 2/17/99 -0500, you wrote:
>John, 
>As previously sent message, return to me.
>Sorry, I've been out of the office all day today.
>Brian
>


Gotta love it :-)


geo2

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, (continued) RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, John Hudson RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, Brian P. Huber RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, bhinderks Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!, John Hermanson Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!, Rand E. Tomcala Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!, Stuart Goggin Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!, ClassicVW Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!, sje Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!, - DORIS FANG - RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, Brian P. Huber RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, George Sears <=

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] Non SLRs and polarizing filters, Wayne Harridge
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] baby's coming - OM-1 flash recommendations, Charles Loeven
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!, Brian P. Huber
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Minox image quality, Keith (R.K.) Berry
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]