Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Damage!
From: "Rand E. Tomcala" <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 12:46:52 -0500
What is this ?  As The Winder Turns?  This is more convoluted and
confusing than the day time soaps when you work on Tuesdays and
Thursdays.
Rand E.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
John Hermanson wrote:
> 
> So what's the deal.  Is the body going back to Jan or Brian  or what.?
> 
> John
> 
> Brian P. Huber wrote:
> >
> > Jan,
> > One of the options I gave you was that I send you 500f the repair cost.
> > I will be doing that tomorrow.  Then I will consider the matter over.
> > You can keep saying all you want.  I certainly haven't asked you for 
> > reimbursement for shipping back to you.
> > Did you also mention that I had double-boxed it to prevent damage?
> > Did you mention that I stated I found the problem after I received the 
> > manual from Olympus?
> > Remember I stated I had never used a 4 before and didn't know how to enable 
> > Spot mode since pressing the button didn't seem to work? Hmm
> >
> > Jan, there's no way you or I at this point can prove or disprove the body 
> > was in working condition when you sent it or
> > when I received it.  We'll always wonder both ways.
> > It's time to drop this and get on with life.
> > Brian Huber
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Jan Steinman [SMTP:jans@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent:   Monday, February 15, 1999 4:27 PM
> > To:     olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject:        RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!
> >
> > >From:  ClassicVW@xxxxxxx [SMTP:ClassicVW@xxxxxxx]
> > ..
> > >P.S.- Avoid - brabfoto@xxxxxx  (e-bay I.D.- Jac1.NL )  he sent me a 
> > >defective
> > >OM-10 body, and when I wished to return it he said: "I don't accept 
> > >returms."
> >
> > >From: "Brian P. Huber" <bphuber@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >Couldn't agree with you more, I'm going through the very situation now.
> >
> > Except in your situation, you claim the package arrives damaged, but you
> > tell the seller you "checked the OM-4, it's fine!"
> >
> > Then four days later you tell the seller the camera is suffering problems
> > consistent with a damaged lens-sensing button.
> >
> > Then the seller offers a refund, but you choose to keep the camera, instead
> > having the seller pay for repairs, based on such damage being covered by
> > postal insurance.
> >
> > But the repair person put in writing on the repair invoice that the damage
> > was not caused by shipping, but by a faulty lens, so an insurance claim is
> > impossible, since the post office requires a copy of the invoice for the
> > claim. The seller respectfully requests that you reimburse the cost of
> > repairs, based on the unbiased findings of the repair shop.
> >
> > Then the camera is returned to you fixed, direct from the repair person,
> > but soon develops the same problem. Co-incidentally, the box seems to be
> > damaged in shipping this time, also. The seller once again, without blame
> > or accuasation, respectfully requests that you reimburse the cost of
> > repairs.
> >
> > Then the seller hears from you that your son may have put a defective lens
> > on the OM-4 the second time, but definately not the first time, and you
> > suggest that you and the seller split the cost of repairs, rather than you
> > pay the entire cost of repairs, as the seller twice respectfully requested.
> >
> > I don't think you're going through the "very situation" at all, Brian.
> >
> > I also don't think this is the proper forum for this, and will not respond
> > on-list to any follow-up. All the above came from email and/or
> > correspondance from an uninvolved third-party (the repair person). My
> > non-response to follow-ups is for the sake of the list, and should NOT be
> > taken as acquiescence to any counter claims that may be posted.
> >
> > : Jan Steinman <mailto:jans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > : 19280 Rydman Court, West Linn, OR 97068-1331 USA
> > : +1.503.635.3229
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz