Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!

Subject: RE: [OM] [OT] Damage!
From: John Hudson <jahudson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 18:00:37 -0800
At 01:27 PM 15-02-99 -0800, jans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>>From: ClassicVW@xxxxxxx [SMTP:ClassicVW@xxxxxxx]
>...
>>P.S.- Avoid - brabfoto@xxxxxx  (e-bay I.D.- Jac1.NL )  he sent me a
defective
>>OM-10 body, and when I wished to return it he said: "I don't accept
returms."
>
>>From: "Brian P. Huber" <bphuber@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>Couldn't agree with you more, I'm going through the very situation now.
>
>Except in your situation, you claim the package arrives damaged, but you
>tell the seller you "checked the OM-4, it's fine!"
>
>Then four days later you tell the seller the camera is suffering problems
>consistent with a damaged lens-sensing button.

It seems to me that if one is willing to buy from strangers at a distance
sight unseen you should accept the consequences and not whine about being
taken for a ride, being diddled, buying a pig in a poke, or discovering the
truth after the fact.

Attention to detail and caution is usually inversely proportional to the
quantum of the outlay.

jh

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz