Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM telephotos.

Subject: Re: [OM] OM telephotos.
From: gma <gma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 08:41:04 -0800
PCACala@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> George writes:
> 
> > Wow! That's quite a task list you got there. I count 6 rolls of film to
> >  do the listed tests. A great service to the list.  THANKS! I'm assuming
> >  your mention of the 350/2.8 tests to come are the tests I volonteered
> >  for.  I've got the film, all I need is a test target.
> 
> This is kind of an open letter.  Comments welcome.
> 
> It is actually 4 1/2 rolls, but that is bad enough.  My first two rounds of
> tests were with a bargain lot of film and mailers.  Yes, the real expenses are
> upon me now.  But the list is incomplete and by virtue of the frequent "how
> does X compare to Y" postings here, there is a need to complete it.
> 
> I appreciate your volunteering to test some of the lenses there are presently
> gaps for!  I just researched out the availability of the same map.  While
> available for $4.00 from the USGS, it is now laminated.  That would confound
> the tests since it would likely make the slides look higher contrast that they
> would photographing my unlaminated copy.
> 
> I found a substitute Canyonland National Park map, but hesitate to have more
> than one map used.
> 
> I'll probably just lend my map out in the future.  Anyone with two photofloods
> or two quartz studio lights can duplicate this test.

I'll just wait until it's available then.

> 
> Finally, the Fujichrome 64T film that I use is about to be replaced with a
> newer emulsion.  If anyone is shopping for film and finds 64T (not the newer
> stuff) on sale as either obsolete stock or expired, please let me know.  I
> could also use a tip on a good source for Fujichrome mailers.  Please, not
> B&H.  I don't care to pay their inflated UPS shipping charge.
> 

How does one determine whether what's in the box is new or old 64T
emulsion?  I grabbed a few rolls of 64T at alocal store, didn't think to
ask about newness of emulsion.

Thanks

George


> Thanks
> 
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz