Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] potential lawsuit; Olympus "impressions"

Subject: Re: [OM] potential lawsuit; Olympus "impressions"
From: "Paul Farrar" <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 12:42:40 -0600 (CST)
> 
> Quite frankly, if I learnnd that a supposed offer for sale was actually
> a private auction, I would have backed away so fast that warp 9 would
> look slow. Nor would I have allowed the seller to constantly "bid me up"
> by claiming -- without proof -- that someone had offered more.

Amen. If that happens, I'm out. Auctions are not auctions if they aren't
open. If the seller wants an auction, he can go to ebay.

> 
> Mr. Steinman has clearly been snockered. But to say
> 
> > If by some chance, you have made a deal with Mr. Cloutier to purchase this
> > equipment, please contact me directly, and perhaps we can work something
> > out between us. I have nothing against you personally, but am prepared to
> > spend many times the value of the equipment in enforcing this agreement,
> > and the party purchasing the equipment from Mr. Cloutier will most likely
> > be named in the suit.
> 
> is absolutely outrageous. The other buyer almost certainly knew nothing
> about this, and to threaten an innocent party with a lawsuit is beneath
> contempt. I don't blame Mr. Steinman for being outrageously angry, but
> you don't take it out on someone who was not party to the offense. The
> equipment in question is hardly stolen war booty.

Steinman, himself, may have superseded someone else who had a commitment
from Cloutier. By this doctrine, Steinman could be sued by that party.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz