Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Is it that bad - yep indeedy!

Subject: Re: [OM] Is it that bad - yep indeedy!
From: gma <gma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 09:27:58 -0700
Oh John;

You're being a bit harsh, aren't you?  Oly can be more than a snapshot camera,
can't it?  It may not be the perfect setup for wildlife, but seems to me a 4T
with a 350/2.8 and a 1.4X, giving an effective 500/4 EDIF, or maybe with the 2X
for 700/5.6, would be a reasonable setup, no?

george

John Gardner wrote:

> Richard Dale <Richard_Dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > How many new products did Nikon produce for their professional system
> over
> > the same period (apart from the F5 body).
>
> A fabulous range of TTL, high powered, daylight fill in, rear curtain sync,
> front curtain sync flash units; a whole boat load of silent wave, internal
> focussing ED lenses (both super fast and normal) and several new bodies
> (F50, F60 F90, F90x etc), not just the incredible F5. If only I could
> afford their 600mm f/4 IFEDS.  sigh......
>
> Yes I do use N*k*n as well as Olympus. As a semi pro wildlife photographer
> I have to own another system besides my beloved OMs, otherwise I'd just
> have to forget it and concentrate on holiday snaps (though some might say I
> ought to do that anyway).
>
> John.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz