Yes, me too, if I have chance to have my photo on font page of Times, I
am willing to pay for a 21/2 or even more.
C.H.Ling
John Petrush wrote:
>
> I think having the cover shot is more than worth a little ding on a filter
> ring - even a big ding. I can buy another 21/2 with the stroke of a check
> (or a little additional VISA card abuse <g>), but you just can't buy the
> front page shot in the 'Times. No, I'd rather my stuff were scuffed and
> dinged with a scrapbook full of published newspaper shots than pristine and
> sitting in a drawer.
>
> > Denton Taylor wrote:
>
> ><<The photo he took was on the front page of the paper, and he e-mailed me
> to
> >tell me so. Unfortunately he also mentioned he slipped and damaged the
> >filter ring, but hey, bet he doesn't care much with a front page photo, eh?
> >
> >Probably the first photo published in the 'Times by Zuiko in a few years,
> >huh?>>
> >
> To which Carl May <Bpsterra@xxxxxxx> replied:
> >Pay for use of photos in newspapers is notoriously lousy. I'd much rather
> >have the 21/2 in pristine shape.
> >
> >Not in the newspaper but in places like the Sunday travel section and in
> >articles in the garden section we have placed several stock Zuiko photos by
> >our Oly-toting photographers in recent years.
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|