| Subject: | Re: [OM] What's wrong with an OM-10? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 May 1998 18:26:55 +1000 |
>IMHO as long as you have an >Oly lens to mount, you should aspire to own at least one OM-1, whatever >else you may own in addition. > Absolutely Joel. Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Oh, that wedding, Terry and Tracey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM]New question OM-5 digital, VELUWEH |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] What's wrong with an OM-10?, Terry and Tracey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] What's wrong with an OM-10?, ONLYOLY BW |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |