John the specs list it at 120 seconds. Have you confirmed the 3 and 1/2 minutes?
Paul.
John Hermanson wrote:
> Just for the record, the 2N has a long exposure limit of 3.5 minutes, not 2
> minutes.
>
> John
>
> Ken Norton wrote:
>
> > Welcome to the list.
> >
> > The OM-1 is a fine camera and one that you wouldn't regret getting,
> > however...
> >
> > An OM-2 would probably be a better choice for you. The OM-1 is strictly a
> > manual camera with nothing automatic about it. It has only the meter
> > needle to inform you of proper exposure and that's it. Also, it has no
> > provision for long shutter speeds except for bulb setting. Any of the OM-2
> > series of cameras (OM-2md, OM-2n, OM-2s, OM-2sp) will give up to 2-minute
> > exposures with average ISO film. Just put it in auto and fire away. (The
> > origional OM-2md will actually go longer in exposure as it didn't have the
> > cutoff circuit).
> >
> > The OM-2 and OM-4 series of cameras have a very nice feature not found in
> > any other camera line: Off-the-film-metering. In laymen's terms, this
> > means that when you are taking your night shot and the lighting changes
> > DURING the exposure, the camera adjusts accordingly as it is actually
> > measuring the light falling on the film. This also means that the exposure
> > is not affected by light entering the viewfinder either. Add a flash to
> > this system and the camera actually controls the flash during the exposure,
> > shutting off the flash when enough light has hit the film.
> >
> > You will not get aperature readings in the viewfinder on any OM camera.
> > Shutter speed, yes, but aperature, no.
> >
> > Another nifty feature of the OM flash control is that the shutter speed
> > will be 1/60 of a second with the flash (normal usage, I'm referring to
> > here, not the wierd exceptions), but the viewfinder display will show what
> > the ambient lighting level is. If you are trying to keep your wedding
> > shots from appearing like they were taken in a cave this is extremely handy
> > as you just adjust the lens opening to achieve the flash/fill ratio that
> > you desire (up to 1:1).
> >
> > As far as lenses are concerned. If nightime pictures are your primary
> > focus, I would look seriously at the 50/1.8 or the 50/1.4. Both are
> > excellent, but flare control is probably a bit better in the 1.8. I
> > primarily use three lenses for nightime: 35shift, 50/1.4, and 100/2.8.
> > All are top notch and produce razer sharp images regardless of the lighting.
> >
> > Another option that you might look at: Olympus has the IS series of
> > cameras. These are Zoom-Lens-Reflex cameras that do not take
> > interchangeable lenses. My IS-1 just got stolen and I'm looking to replace
> > it with an IS-3. The lens is very good, the viewfinder bright and does
> > show both shutter speed and aperature. Furthermore, it has nightime modes
> > which bring this camera into the must have for nightime work. I have
> > several nightime shots that have made into print and one into widespread
> > use as a screen background from the IS-1. One cool feature is the zoom in
> > nightime mode. You press the shutter and then the zoom button of the
> > direction you want it to zoom and it will properly expose the shot and then
> > zoom in/out to achieve the "exploding lights" look. Best feature of all,
> > in the IS-1 is the spot metering. (the OM-2s, OM-3t, and OM-4(ti) all have
> > spot meters)
> >
> > I wouldn't worry too much about buying a camera with the "hole in the
> > bottom" provided it spent all of its life on a winder or motor drive. The
> > big problem is that the OM-1 and OM-2 cameras (non S models) have the
> > internal mechanism pretty open and dirt/dust/moisture can really crud up
> > the internals. I would be asking serious questions about the camera's
> > heritage and if you can't get satisfactory answers I probably wouldn't
> > bother with the camera. Especially if they are asking $200. If it is in
> > perfect condition and an OM-1n model maybe, but it might be a bit high
> > otherwise.
> >
> > Again, welcome to the list. I'll try to not be as verbose next time.
> >
> > Ken Norton
> >
> > ############################################################
> > | This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
> > | To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > | with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
> > | To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
> > | listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
> > | For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > | htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
> > ############################################################
>
> ############################################################
> | This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
> | To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
> | To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
> | listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
> | For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
> ############################################################
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
| listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|