I'm actually pretty pleased with it. I haven't done much conceptional
"art first" photography in the past couple of years, so the AI
interpretation isn't a problem for me. It does a really good job of
providing a "standardized" lab adjustment to the image.
AG Schnozz
On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 9:33 AM MICHAEL GORDON via olympus
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anyone tried this of late? It is relatively new and seems to be a good
> starting point for many images. Not sure I want AI to dictate post
> processing, but it can save time. I had not bothered to use it until
> recently.
>
> Adaptable, Mike
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|