[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Depth of Camellia [was Better Late . . .]

Subject: Re: [OM] Depth of Camellia [was Better Late . . .]
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:53:22 -0700
On 3/10/2024 4:23 PM, usher99--- via olympus wrote:
The F 1.2 stack is clearly the winner and not just for the bokeh.  Marnie 

Excellent! I do like the rendering.

How'd you get to 91 images?

Simple enough, if tedious. C2 default is set with f5.6 and a stack of 31 slices. Right for usual lenses and subjects. Only needed 17 for this subject.

Set to f1.2, and it's nowhere near deep enough. Back, shoot again, with 51 - nope, still way too shallow. Back outside, try 91, and it's just barely enough depth. I use numbers like 31 to make identifying a stack by frame number easy. Start frame = 153, end frame will be 183. (Also, I like Odd. 😂 )

This is why test runs at home are good. 🙂

Speedy Burst Moose

What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz