| Subject: | Re: [OM] Depth of Camellia [was Better Late . . .] |
|---|---|
| From: | usher99--- via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:23:17 +0000 (UTC) |
| Cc: | "usher99@xxxxxxx" <usher99@xxxxxxx> |
The F 1.2 stack is clearly the winner and not just for the bokeh. Marnie agrees. How'd you get to 91 images? Deep stack, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] IMG: Back to Brussels, Nathan Wajsman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Depth of Camellia [was Better Late . . .], Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] IMG: Back to Brussels, Nathan Wajsman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Depth of Camellia [was Better Late . . .], Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |