[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] How does it look?

Subject: Re: [OM] How does it look?
From: usher99--- via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "usher99@xxxxxxx" <usher99@xxxxxxx>
They all have their positive attributes but the TTartisans is most "organic" 
with enough sharpness to work and the modified bokeh one is my first choice.  I 
reluctantly say that as you de-bubblefied it and bubbles are the bokeh hallmark 
of that lens.  The reworked 12-200 rendition is sharper but less artistic IMO. 
The soft filter is a bit too soft for me but does work and might be a nice 
print.  "Organic" is an odd term for someone who had to calculate parameters to 
6 significant figures in Pchem, but that is what I think. ;-)
I wonder if the bubblfy bokeh feature in PS will limit the need to carry a 
specific lens, but that is an experiment for another day.
Speak softly but not too softly, Mike
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [OM] How does it look?, usher99--- via olympus <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz