Good enough for me, Mike - a stunning composition (and exposition!)
Piers
On Sun, 28 May 2023, 22:04 Mike Gordon via olympus, <
olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Marnie dutifully went through the whole procedure she trained to do
> despite it clouding up by the time we got back to the "flower pot" classic
> stacks. The tide was coming in the second night but it momentarily cleared
> over that stack enough to see the MW, so I ran back at least to stack the
> sky just before we left. We had to skedaddle within 5 minutes as the tide
> was coming up on an area we needed to traverse to get off the beach, so I
> skipped the foreground. My stacked foreground had less detail with
> blocked shadows. Marnie had hers and it was taken just a few feet away, so
> the MW is accurately placed. I suppose it is a fake composite of sorts but
> still was accurate enough to meet my standards. The PL 9/1.7 is compatible
> with starry sky autofocus but is very touchy to manually focus for the
> foreground.
>
> https://www.olyendomike.com/Bay-of-Fundy-2023/i-72d2HWG/A
>
> The mask for the sky isn't perfect but it is a very difficult process with
> all the tree branches.
>
> Fundy Mike
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|