Depends on your computer’s capabilities, no?
> Le 1 juil. 2021 à 19:32, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Almost forgot this. Comparison of Adobe Enhance and Enhance/enlarge in PS to
> Topaz Gigapixel AI.
> Enhance alone is far inferior on all subjects to Topaz Denoise
> @ 2x, neither of them, at any setting, does a great job on the text and fine
> "web" engraving on the currency. GP is clearly superior on Tom and the pencil
> art, and spectacularly better on the abstract bowl art.
> Exemplary Moose
> On 6/29/2021 2:36 PM, Moose wrote:
>> On 6/29/2021 11:56 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>> I shot this image of a Crocus volunteer in 2012 with my Olympus E-1 and
>>> Leica Elmarit-R Macro lens, and used Enhance in Lightroom today to
>>> reprocess the RAW image. Though I have only enlarged it to screen size, I
>>> am convinced that, for my purposes, Enhance works fine.
>> My right brain says "Pretty"
>> My left brain says "Artifacts!"
>> I agree with your comment that it is better with some subjects than others.
>> Same for Topaz Gigapixel. In my comparison testing, Topaz did a better job
>> with more subjects, but I didn't do enough different things to make any
>> blanket comparison.
>> As I seldom want to uprez, I'd likely just try both.
>> Em Biggened Moose
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/