[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Examples [was Enhanced Crocus Image from 2012]

Subject: [OM] Examples [was Enhanced Crocus Image from 2012]
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:32:58 -0700

Almost forgot this. Comparison of Adobe Enhance  and Enhance/enlarge in PS to Topaz Gigapixel AI. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/Adobe_Enhance&SuperRes/GigaP_vs_AdobeEnhance.htm>

Enhance alone is far inferior on all subjects to Topaz Denoise

@ 2x, neither of them, at any setting, does a great job on the text and fine "web" engraving on the currency. GP is clearly superior on Tom and the pencil art, and spectacularly better on the abstract bowl art.

Exemplary Moose

On 6/29/2021 2:36 PM, Moose wrote:
On 6/29/2021 11:56 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
I shot this image of a Crocus volunteer in 2012 with my Olympus E-1 and Leica Elmarit-R Macro lens, and used Enhance in Lightroom today to reprocess the RAW image. Though I have only enlarged it to screen size, I am convinced that, for my purposes, Enhance works fine.


My right brain says "Pretty"

My left brain says "Artifacts!"

I agree with your comment that it is better with some subjects than others. Same for Topaz Gigapixel. In my comparison testing, Topaz did a better job with more subjects, but I didn't do enough different things to make any blanket comparison.

As I seldom want to uprez, I'd likely just try both.

Em Biggened Moose

What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz