Almost forgot this. Comparison of Adobe Enhance and Enhance/enlarge in PS to Topaz Gigapixel AI.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Process/Adobe_Enhance&SuperRes/GigaP_vs_AdobeEnhance.htm>
Enhance alone is far inferior on all subjects to Topaz Denoise
@ 2x, neither of them, at any setting, does a great job on the text and fine "web" engraving on the currency. GP is
clearly superior on Tom and the pencil art, and spectacularly better on the abstract bowl art.
Exemplary Moose
On 6/29/2021 2:36 PM, Moose wrote:
On 6/29/2021 11:56 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
I shot this image of a Crocus volunteer in 2012 with my Olympus E-1 and Leica Elmarit-R Macro lens, and used Enhance
in Lightroom today to reprocess the RAW image. Though I have only enlarged it to screen size, I am convinced that,
for my purposes, Enhance works fine.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20120301-P3011603-Enhanced.JPG.html
My right brain says "Pretty"
My left brain says "Artifacts!"
I agree with your comment that it is better with some subjects than others. Same for Topaz Gigapixel. In my comparison
testing, Topaz did a better job with more subjects, but I didn't do enough different things to make any blanket
comparison.
As I seldom want to uprez, I'd likely just try both.
Em Biggened Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
