Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Fwd: The new Oly 100-400 compared to PL 100-400

Subject: [OM] Fwd: The new Oly 100-400 compared to PL 100-400
From: MICHAEL GORDON via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:05:00 -0400
Cc: MICHAEL GORDON <usher99@xxxxxxx>
Correction below.  Oly a bit slower—see max aperture at each FL in review.  
Rushing to get home at work with no proof read of post.   As feared, a bunch of 
trees were down on my two usual ways and finally found a way around.  Tree down 
in driveway but minimally damage.  
Wind blown, Mike 
> 
> A bit bigger, faster and sharper at wide apertures and compatible with  1.4 
> and 2.0 TC, but slower.  Seems odd they didn't make it work with sync IS but 
> it is not a "pro" series lens.  I do like the AS tripod foot but the 
> advantage of the MFT IS system is to enable it to be handheld.  If it somehow 
> is the cat's meow with a 1.4 TC (prolly not really possible), I could be 
> tempted--also like the weather sealing. 
> Doubt Moose will be tempted as the PL works nicely with Dual IS and is more 
> portable. Enjoyed the review and thought others might too.
> 
> 
> 
> https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/micro-four-thirds-lenses/olympus-100-400mm-vs-panasonic-100-400mm/
> 
> Taking the long view, , Mike

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz