Re: [OM] 180/2 at KEH

[Ken Norton]

> Quite a nice beast.  I like the bokeh and subject isolation 
> opportunities--seems much nicer than the f2.8 version.  I don't like the 
> sawtooth bokeh when stopped down a bit--I think the aperture mechanisms have 
> evolved.

I'd rather have the 250/2. I think it would serve me a whole lot
better. But it doesn't matter too much because I really wouldn't want
to lug it around. The 200/4 and 300/4.5 are humungous enough.

But I wouldn't turn my back on the Four-Thirds F2 lenses. yum.

AG Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/