> Might you have been slogging around in the mud too long, so a naturally clean
> image is surprising? I have, over the last
> few years, used both Panny and Oly µ4/3 bodies, and have never noticed any
> such difference in the Raw files, as
> converted by ACR, primarily, DxO, and a couple of others. DxO defaults look
> different than ACR, but much the same
> between brands.
I'm processing the images in the latest/greatest version of Lightroom Classic.
I definitely see the effect and I didn't put it there. I'll show an
image tomorrow that perfectly illustrates it. As to clean images, the
6D had me spoiled.
AF Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|