Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 240 MP? {was Any interest/comments concerning tiny Siggie FP Fu

Subject: Re: [OM] 240 MP? {was Any interest/comments concerning tiny Siggie FP Full frame mirrorless?]
From: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 19:26:27 -0700
> From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> But actually, if you can afford it, go for the mark II...
>> It will be my next Oly purchase...
> 
> I really want to stay full-frame...
> even though the [micro four thirds] sensor is rather diminutive

In my experience, on non-moving subject, the full-frame dynamic range and noise 
advantage is largely blown away by significantly better IBIS.

If you can shoot hand-held at ISO 400 that which would require ISO 1600 on a 
full-frame camera with less-capable IBIS, you've blown away the noise advantage.

And as the Ctein print discussion shows, megapickles aren't everything, 
although the OM-D E-M1 Mark II and EM-1x can provide you with 80 megapickles 
when you need them.

Jan

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz