I suspect that you’re right, Jan – about the entrenched way.
It’s more of an archive, really, and I found it interesting only in passing.
For instance, there were pages about “The Iraq War”, as if there had been only
one in recent times. Then there was mention of the “Fight for Freedom”, again
about “The Iraq War” – as if invading that Third World country had anything at
all to do with the freedom of US citizens.
I had to stop reading/watching . . .
Chris
> On 13 Aug 2018, at 17:24, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But then, at the transport level, TCP/IP itself carries source information
> that can be traced by repressive governments. Although such info can be faked
> for attacks and such, it cannot be faked if one desires two-way
> communication. So it would seem the entire basis for the Internet Protocol
> would have to be re-done to do a proper job. You'd need to have a
> distributed, pseudo-random return address protocol of some sort.
>
> Fascinating to think about, but I think "the current way" is too entrenched.
> Nerve cells and synapses have been around too long for nature to re-do living
> sensory systems, and the same may be true of TCP/IP.
>
> Jan
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|