On 4/23/2018 4:09 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
<<I do hope if they fold that the lens profiles are picked up by someone else
and
<<kept up to date
Most disconcerting. I second the Moose's motion. The DXO one camera business
did seem rather cockamamie and perhaps led to losses
Oh yeah, I forgot about that - which may say a lot about what a poor idea it was. I couldn't see the point. I imagine
Oly's Air-01 hasn't been a big success, nor do I imagine they expected it to be. But it makes a lot more sense to me.
Larger sensor, and, much more importantly on such small cameras, Panny OIS lenses work on it. And - more than one FL.
The 12-32 is a perfect fit. The 35-100 is good, too.
--certainly the tech support suffered. DXOMark may be set on their own--not
good to lose the coding/optics expertise.
DXOMark has never made much sense to me. Where I know cameras and lenses, their ratings often don't agree with my
experience. Thus, I take their ratings of others with grains of salt.
De X o De O (de o do) Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|