And who also wrote a piece on identifying rogue Adaptall OM mounts not good
for OM3 and 4 bodies, last seen on Mark Dapoz' dementix site!
On 24 Feb 2018 8:41 pm, "piers@xxxxxxxx" <piers.hemy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now you tell me!
>
> Piers ....
>
> Who bought Jan's 300/2.8
I remember the adaptall issue from the list. Just had to get the OL version or
epoxy the screw and then no issue.
http://www.adaptall-2.com/pdf/OMTamronMount.pdf
The Tam 300/2.8 was well though of as I recall. I have the 400/4 but a bit
of CA with less resolution than some recent lenses but has a nice rendering.
300/2.8 link
https://www.scottscheetzphotography.com/blog/equipment-review-tamron-300mm-f28
Adaptable, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|