What I had meant in the first place, thanks
Amities
Philippe
> Le 21 juin 2017 à 01:02, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> I might have cropped the top 1/3rd or 2/5ths of the sky out of the original
> image and left your cropped-out right side area in place. That would have
> eliminated some, but not all, of the over-blue sky in the top left and top
> right hand corners.
>
> Cropping the right side of the image looks to me to have intruded into the
> rule of thirds whereby the roadway now occupies the bottom right quadrant as
> compared to its placement in the middle third of the third row down. I did
> not find the bush like tree in the lower right hand corner of the original
> image to be a distraction. Indeed I found it to be an interesting detail as
> my eye followed the curvature of the road.
>
> Perhaps you could upload a third image for viewing based on cropping the top
> 1/3rd or 2/5ths of the sky.
>
> So much for personal aesthetics !
>
> jh
>
>
>
>
> On 2017-06-20 1:39 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> Following Philippe’s suggestion: crop away the right-most part so that the
>> image focuses on the curvy road more. And this also gets rid of the
>> offending sky.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>> YNWA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Jun 2017, at 13:43, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, quite obviously, but what drove you to choose the cut off point and
>>> crop out some portion of the image?
>>>
>>> jh
>>>
>>> On 2017-06-19 1:52 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>>> The cut-off point is exactly where I placed it, of course!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>> YNWA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 19 Jun 2017, at 02:22, John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> In the present two examples, where is the cut off point between "tighter
>>>>> is better" and not tight enough from which the conclusion, albeit
>>>>> subjectively, concludes that the less tight image is an "inferior" image?
>>>>>
>>>>> jh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2017-06-18 8:37 PM, Moose wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/18/2017 11:09 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>>>>>> I have followed Philippe’s suggestion, and the alternate image is here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/i-dBWR9P3/A
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having looked at the two images side by side, I conclude that
>>>>>>> Philippe’s suggestion was right on the money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree. A case where tighter is better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AoV Moose
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|