My bad then :-)
I was mislead by the caption of the first pix
Your latest endeavour is by far the best
OTT, I read that irrident is also making progress in the RAF
conversion for the X-T2
Thanks
Amities
Philippe
2017-01-24 12:34 UTC+01:00, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 1/23/2017 11:18 PM, Philippe Amard wrote:
>> I'm afraid you're applying a technique meant for RAW to JPEGs,
>
> No.
>
>> or am I mistaken?
>
> Yes.
>
> I worked from the RAF file. The JPEG is only included, unmodified from what
> came out of the camera, to show how it
> differs from the RAF file LR/ACR default conversion, the Bridgwood
> processing and my processing. It seems that many
> folks are enamored of the Fuji JPEGs, so I thought I should include it. I
> was not impressed with its special merits.
>
> For your amusement, I've added my further version of the feathers part.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Fuji_X-T2/X-T2_proc1.htm>
>
> RAFfish Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|