It did work out quite well. IBIS improvements basically mean you may
get the same results at even lower speeds.
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/14/2016 4:36 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Hi Chuck,
I am aware of the move to MFT and subsequent improvements. But my
priorities lean toward WIHOH (what I have on hand). I thought it
worked out quite well. :-)
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 10/14/2016 1:04 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
Good results on an interesting test. But IBIS is much improved on MFT
cameras now doing 5 axis.
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/14/2016 11:44 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
My Olympus E-510, which I haven't used much in recent years, has "In
Body Image Stabilization", or IBIS. Because of that fact, I have paired
it up with the Leica Elmarit-R 90mm recently for butterfly photos.
While the CMOS sensor is only 10MP, it works well for closeups.
During a slow point in the Denver-San Diego football game last night, I
decided to see how well the IBIS system worked. I shot some hand-held
screen shots, using Aperture Preferred automatic exposure. This worked
out to be ISO 100, 1/13 sec at f/4, using the 90mm lens.
Except for the movement of the Closed Caption "crawler", the remainder
of the image is acceptably sharp. I was impressed.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Thursday+Night+Football.tif.html
Please view LARGE.
Comments and critiques welcomed and appreciated.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|