Re: [OM] Megapixels and detail in images

[Chuck Norcutt]

Or one can do away with the filter and use HDR techniques or take 2 
exposures and fuse them under mask in Photoshop... or, just maybe, the 
dynamic range is actually good enough to adjust the single image (as 
Moose sometimes comments)
Chuck Norcutt

On 9/15/2016 10:02 AM, Chris Trask wrote:
>      The sunset glare photos help to illustrate the value of a sliding 
> graduated filter to attenuate the brightness of the sky and sun while at the 
> same time bringing out the foreground.  I would have used a Cokin neutral 
> density graduated filter in those instances.
>
> > I have to confess that this issue puzzles me. Yes, I know it is not
> > the only one ...
> >
> > For some time I have been somewhat disappointed by
> > the amount of image detail provided by OM digital cameras.
> >
> > The best
> > two I have are very close in performance as far as I can tell; these are
> > the E-3 and the DE M5.
> >
> > I've just taken delivery of John shaw's book
> > "Digital Nature Photography" in which he points out that he uses
> > exclusively Nikon gear and the Nikon D800e has 36.30 Megapixels.
>      <<SNIP>>
>
> Chris
>
> When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
>      - Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/