Lenses don't have depth of field. Apertures, focal lengths, distances
and viewing magnifications do. You should be able to repeat this with
any other lens at the same aperture focal length and shooting distance.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/13/2016 2:07 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<- [2] Date -> [3] <- [4] Thread -> [5]
From: Moose
(olymoosegmail.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
On
9/12/2016 3:24 AM, bj [at] caverock.net.nz wrote:
Micros made using
ancient manual (film) lenses.
Enjoy!!
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=20772 [1]
The two with
greater magnification are pushing the DoF envelope for me, even at f22.
And f22 gets deep into diffraction softening on a 4/3 sensor. Not that
you can see that at this image display size. That's why I love having
focus stacking in my bag 'o tricks.
Nice to see some springtime as we
ease in to fall.
I'm really pleased with the DOF of the Sigma lens. I
hoped it would be that good, and it was.
It was rather close-up.
Brian
Links:
------
[1]
http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=20772
[2]
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/msg53619.html
[3]
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/msg53621.html
[4]
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/msg53613.html
[5]
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/msg53625.html
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|