Re: [OM] E-M1 II [was] IMG: Giving Respect to the Oly E-1]

[Chuck Norcutt]

I think I've pretty well adapted to the slower lenses and not been 
tempted by any of the Pro versions.  I suspect the 12-100/4 will not be 
much different in size/weight than the 12-40/2.8 which is close to 14 oz.
Chuck Norcutt


On 9/1/2016 3:55 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 9/1/2016 12:46 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> > It must be getting close.  B&H sent me an offer this morning for $300
> > off the E-M1 (Mk 1).  I'll be in line to get one when it arrives...
> > assuming the price is similar to the original Mk 1 price ($1,199.99)
> I will probably be torn. I'd like the latest features, but don't like
> the size and shape I'm expecting, compared to the svelte E-M5 II.
>
> I'm more excited about the 12-100/4 Pro, but afraid it will be too big
> and heavy. I'm already carrying around the Panny 100-400. Add another
> big bertha, and I'll either become like Edward Weston about distance
> from the car, or start looking like a navvy.
>
> No Porter Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/