ML Archiv: Re: [OM] New lens

Subject:	Re: [OM] New lens
From:	Dharma Singh <dharmasingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:22:36 +0100

Not for me this lens; too expensive and too heavy for my personal needs.
I saw a first review of the lens in practice and I think I can accept his
findings.

http://www.mirrorlessons.com/2016/01/06/the-olympus-300mm-f4-pro-review/
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] New lens, Paul Braun Re: [OM] New lens, Moose [OM] New lenses - more, Moose Re: [OM] New lens, Chris Trask Re: [OM] New lens, Paul Braun Re: [OM] New lens, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] New lens, Ken Norton Re: [OM] New lens, Moose Re: [OM] New lens, Ken Norton Re: [OM] New lens, Dharma Singh <= Re: [OM] New lens, Moose Re: [OM] New lens, Mike Lazzari Re: [OM] New lens, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] New lens, Moose Re: [OM] New lens, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] New lens, Moose Re: [OM] New lens, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] New lens, Mike Gordon via olympus Re: [OM] New lens, Michael Wong Re: [OM] New lens, Moose

Previous by Date:	[OM] 300 f2.8 tamaron adapt alls, Mark Kronquist
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] My blog, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] New lens, Ken Norton
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] New lens, Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]