Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMGS: SL with 35/2.0 Summicron M Lens

Subject: Re: [OM] IMGS: SL with 35/2.0 Summicron M Lens
From: Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:09:57 +0000
But it definitely depends where you're coming from whether you think it's
big - here it is against a Nik FF model:
http://camerasize.com/compare/#639,557
or even against my modest little one:
http://camerasize.com/compare/#639,7

Jez, schlepping...

On 29 November 2015 at 10:03, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/28/2015 11:22 PM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
>
>> I was intrigued by this thread and went looking for info, first thing that
>> struck me was how similar this Leica looks to the Sony mirrorless bodies.
>>
>
> Vaguely so, but the Leica is a great deal larger. <
> http://camerasize.com/compare/#639,579>
>
> Another thing, weren't all the M series also mirrorless ?
>>
>
> And the earlier, screw mount bodies, all rangefinders, all mirrorless.
> Only the R(eflex) had a mirror.
>
> Eye of the Beholding Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz