Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Cornell's website can ID bird species through photos

Subject: Re: [OM] Cornell's website can ID bird species through photos
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:29:18 -0700
On 7/12/2015 12:10 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Been a bit under the weather of late so could not respond to posts I should 
have, or at least felt compelled to respond.

Focused Moose writes:
<<<Moderate softness from diffraction that can be partially corrected with 
deconvolution*

Yes, at first blush one would not predict either exact PSF deconvolution as 
used by Canyon or blind R-L deconvolution as used in FM would work very well
due to the obliteration of some high freq detail at a hard cutoff from 
diffraction which is distinctly different than Gaussian blur.

I did post something to that effect:
http://lists.tako.de/Olympus-OM/2013-02/msg01884.html

Why do you think I footnoted to you?

Empiric evidence mounting to the contrary , revisited that issue and also 
spotted a review by Roger at Lensrentals.

http://lists.tako.de/html/Olympus-OM/2013-05/msg02068.html

http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/03/overcoming-my-fentekaphobia

So the Diffraction monster's teeth aren't that long and non-determinate  PSF 
deconvolution can still improve the images.
To quote my own post:

As in the pin-hole
example, I neglected to consider that in diffraction softened images
deconvolution sharpening can (with non-determinate PSF's) do increase
detail CONTRAST, though you can't really increase the maximum detail
frequency.

OK to stop down a bit more than originally thought

The proof is still in the viewing of the pudding. :-)

As you quoted Roger before:

"The message I took away, though, is that diffraction softening is
real, it occurs where it is supposed to, but it’s really not as severe
as I had thought. Even on the D800 resolution is as high, or higher, at
f/16 than it was at f/2.8. At f/11 the resolution is as good, or
better, than at f/4. And at both f/11 and f/16 resolution is clearly
higher than it was wide open. Perhaps the diffraction monster’s teeth
AREN'T as long and wicked as I thought."

Not so Red in Tooth and Claw Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz