Re: [OM] OM-D E-M5 II video shooting [Was: Video shooting by E-M5]

[C.H.Ling]

If you don't need the long reach (400mm) you can try RX-10 (24-200mm F2.8), 
it has a better lens and more solid body. May be not as fast as the FZ1000 
in operation.
C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Wong" <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx>

> I do think the picture quality of FZ1000 is pretty good after watching
> these samples.
> http://www.dchome.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1295297&extra=page%3D1
> (just for photo samples)
>
> Yup, up to now, FZ1000 is a better choice.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> On 3 June 2015 at 15:43, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > You can have hours of video on a 32GB SDHC card if you shoot 1080p, only
> > 4K video take you 100Mb/S. It is 8xxg with a 25-400mm F2.8-4 lens, you
> > won't get anything close to this with your M4/3 system. To be fair, the
> > lens may not be very good for still but for video it is fine.
> >
> > It is totally unacceptable for any device that is not capable of playing
> > AVCHD today. If you really worry about AVCHD you can use MP4 anytime, 
> > there
> > is an option to shoot MP4 on FZ1000.
> >
> >
> > C.H.Ling
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Wong" <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >  Thanks CH.
> > > Upon search information about Panasonic FZ1000 from internet, seems it 
> > > is
> > > the best choice under HK$8,000 (HK wholesaler) or HK$6,000 (parallel
> > > import) for both still image & video shooting except its weight over 
> > > 800g.
> > > The maximum recording time  will be a concern for the videos for 
> > > working,
> > > I
> > > have found a post in dpreview that if 40 mins for 32GB SDXC card is
> > > acceptable.
> > > http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3711308
> > >
> > > Another concern of playing AVCHD & convert it to other format, it should
> > > be
> > > solved.
> > > http://www.iskysoft.com/article/avchd-player-for-mac.html
> > > http://www.winxdvd.com/resource/play-avchd-on-mac.htm
> > >
> > > However, related the disadvantages of playing back AVCHD video directly 
> > > on
> > > Mac OS in the 2nd article, my Apple cinema is old type 20" with 1680 x
> > > 1050. That means I have to convert the AVCHD video every time before
> > > playing? Oh! My God!
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/