Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Least, [was Most] eclectic camera bag

Subject: Re: [OM] Least, [was Most] eclectic camera bag
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:49:41 -0700
On 3/17/2015 2:45 PM, Rick Beckrich wrote:
M'Gawd... No wonder you guys look so tired.

I look tired? Not feeling it. I usually feel pretty energized when out in the 
field, makin' pix.

I'm worn out with the E-1, 12-60 OMD and my C5050.

I think you misunderstand the size/weight of µ4/3 vs 4/3.

"... E-1, 12-60 OMD and my C5050." comes to 1,790 g, or 3#, 14 oz., to you and 
me.

The ones I mention carrying, E-M5, 12-50, E-M5II, 75-300, come to 1,535 g, 3#, 
6 oz.

(Yeah, I know, "the 12-60 is magic." Never used one. I do know the 12-50 is a very 
fine lens, including a very useful and effective macro mode. (Is that what the C5050 is for, 
macro?) And yes, it's about 2/3 stop slower, but the latest µ4/3 sensors are more like 
3-4 stops less noisy than the E-1. Admittedly, I never drank the E-1 color Kool-Aid.)

(OK maybe one OM-1n with one lens, too.)

OM-1n is 510 g, another 1#, 2 oz. Plus which lens?

No wonder you are looking so tired! ;-)

I prescribe an OMD, say E-M10 with 14-150 lens, 681 g, 1# 8 oz.

Or a Panny GM5 with 12-32 & 35-100, 416 g, 15 oz.*

Either combo will take technically better images over a longer FL range than what you are carrying, for a LOT less size and weight.

Sprightly Strong Moose

* I have the GM1, 12-32 and 45-150 as a light kit, 'cause the GM5 and 35-100 didn't exist yet, and, well, I like the extra tele reach. Needs an extension tube for C-U.

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz