| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM 180mm F2.8 opinions |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:11:29 -0800 |
Apropos nothing but the fact that this thread has been up and I was wandering through the byways of odd stuff I've
posted over the years ...
I have no idea at the moment where these samples came from, and can't say I completely prefer one of the other, but they may be of interest in the 180-200 mm wars. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/Zuiko200-180/200-180.htm> Cob Webs Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ***SPAM*** Re: Simple lens designs like Tessar on Digital cameras., Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sigma 170-500mm 1:5-6.3 Lens, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM 180mm F2.8 opinions, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM 180mm F2.8 opinions, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |