Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Time to revise the pano hardware plan

Subject: Re: [OM] Time to revise the pano hardware plan
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:07:40 -0400
I've never had a problem with landscapes even hand held. But I brought this up originally in the context of interior architectural panos where there might be lots of stuff up close. It became a problem for me after I realized I'd misplaced my EOS mount Tamron 20-40 which left me with a Zuiko 24/2.8 as my widest lens. I'm hoping I left the 20-40 in Florida somehow as I don't know how else I might have lost it. I won't know until January of maybe even February when I get back there again.

Chuck Norcutt

On 7/6/2014 12:23 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
I don't know if this point has been brought up or not, but the offset
matters not unless you have a close object within the picture. And
even at that, it's a non issue if the close object falls within one of
the images in the matrix.

The far greater issue is not the offset, but the lens design itself.

--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz