ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 10:02:51 -0500

> Kodak EASILY eclipses olympus in that regard. No contest at all. I am sure
> there are others. Graflex comes to mind as well.

LOL, you are right. Kodak was the Apple of the camera/film industry.


-- 
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, (continued) Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Ken Norton [OM] OT - for sport car enthusiasts only, John Hudson Re: [OM] OT - for sport car enthusiasts only, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Peter Klein Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Ken Norton [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Mike Gordon via olympus Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Ken Norton [OM] portability of Olympus digital lenses, John Hudson Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Sawyer, Edward Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Sawyer, Edward Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Ken Norton

Previous by Date:	[OM] IMG: Propeller, Tina Manley
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: Watching, Paul Braun
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Sawyer, Edward
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Oly Imaging Group still not doing so hot, Sawyer, Edward
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]