> Before concluding that image detail has been lost, look closely. A sense of
> sharpness, from the grain edges, is gone,
> but I don't think any actual image detail has been lost. I'm not advocating
> such NR (down AG!), only showing how poor
> the NR examples are in this review supposedly about NR.
Nah, no argument from me. My only thing is that some noise/grain can
create the artificial impression of increased sharpness and detail.
> On the basis of what's shown in this review, I wouldn't touch Optics Pro 9
> with a ten foot pole. I'm sure, however that
> it isn't as bad as shown. Whatever this guy's other skills, he's incompetent
> in the digital darkroom.
Wow. Hand out the "I agree with Moose" shirts again. Keep this up and
people will think we're the Bobbsey Twins.
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|