On 1/14/2014 9:56 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Ahh, another fine Moose color/texture post. Well done.
Thank you!
> Must be the diminutive but well performing PZ 14-42
Indeed; an excellent lens that got a bad rap because of a failing of Panny
bodies, shutter shock. You can see the job it
did in the 100% samples.
I had the E-PM2 and lens in my jacket pocket.
> and not the 14-150 given the max aperture mentioned.
> I think that cam has the advantage of not having the weirdo 16:9
> display with resultant loss of real estate for stills.
Nope, same as it's predecessor and the E-PL3 and 5. I don't notice anymore.
Not altogether senseless. There just isn't room for a taller LCD on the body.
Making it wider is good for video, I
suppose. For stills, it gets most of the info display off the image area.
H. D. Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|