----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>> The access time of normal hard disk is very slow, in the range 5-10ms
>> (the
>> actual random seek time is much more than that). While the SSD can handle
>> ~100K IOPS, it is 0.01ms. Which is much faster than a HD. So I expected
>> using a single SSD for both PS and Window would be ok.
>
> I would replace 'expect' with 'assume'. I do so in order to bring out an
> old, and annoying, saying in English:
>
> "When you assume, you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me'"
>
Thanks for the lesson :-)
> I think it possible that an SSD would avoid the problem. Absent proof, I
> will not expect/assume it to be so.
>
If I have a proof there is no assume necessay, two SSD sure will be faster,
it is just a matter of 10% or 100%. If my assumption fail, just purchase a
second SSD if necessary.
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|