Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Cost - Image Editing System

Subject: Re: [OM] Cost - Image Editing System
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:56:31 +0800
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> On 6/10/2013 6:22 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> I'm with you, if the SSD is large enough it can hold both OS and 
>> cache/temp
>> files at the same time, no second SSD required.
>
> It's not a matter of size. As Adobe and others explain it, the problem is 
> that both Windoze and PS are trying to use the
> same disk for their caches at the same time, and they run into each other. 
> I think this is certainly true with HDs.
>
> How much the faster seek and R/W times of SSDs will alleviate this, I 
> don't know.
>

The access time of normal hard disk is very slow, in the range 5-10ms (the 
actual random seek time is much more than that). While the SSD can handle 
~100K IOPS, it is 0.01ms. Which is much faster than a HD. So I expected 
using a single SSD for both PS and Window would be ok.

C.H.Ling 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz