I don't understand what this is supposed to show us. You say the Nikon
scanner can do a better job than the 5D II with 80/4 but the 4000ED
image you show us is quite small and labeled 300dpi.
The 5D II images are much larger but seem to me to be mostly grain. If
the grain is resolved don't we have everything there is to get from the
image?
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/18/2013 1:53 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> I think the E-M5 may not be able to resolve a good 35mm frame. While I was
> working with the 80/4 and 5D II setup, I found it is not even able to get
> all from an old 35mm Kodak CP100. The result is ok for most application but
> not the best one can get, a sharp 4000dpi scanner like N*kon 4000ED seem did
> better.
>
> Here is a crop from a 1984 Beijing shot taken with Sigma 35-70/2.8-4 on
> OM-10, handheld.
>
> 4000ED at 300dpi
>
> www.accura.com.hk/temp/1984-09B-35.jpg
>
> 5D II, 80/4 at 1:1, F11
>
> www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_0088.jpg
>
> 5D II, 80/4 and f=170mm macro adapter
>
> www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_0089.jpg
>
> C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|