My only suggestion, Brian, is that you conduct scientifically based
research on the effectivesness (effect) of the IS. That is, to exclude
the possibility that IS is actually degrading your image quality. In
my experience IS should only be used when needed - if the shutter
speed is short enough that I can hand-hold the camera successfully, I
always disable IS because I always get a better result.
But again, this is with ONE camera etc.
Piers
On 01/04/2013, Brian Swale <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Moose wrote inter alia
>>
>> On 3/29/2013 4:06 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
>>
>> > I see Mike used an Olympus SP350 - a camera I had not previously heard
>> > of. An 8 MP camera as well.
>> >
>> > Timing and light are critical components which Mike has nailed, but it
>> > is also sharp.
>> Digital sampling ALWAYS softens edges - ALWAYS. The original capture of a
>> subject, scanning an analog source and
>
> In reply I merely point out that it is not usually permissible in scientific
>
> analysis to extrapolate beyond the bounds of data.
>
> My comments were mainly about the past and present performance of just
> ONE E-3 coupled with the same DZ 14-54 lens, hand-held and with IS on.
> Same computer gear used for both past and present images, and same
> operator except for an unquantifiable age factor..
>
> Brian Swale
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|